• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
84%
Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Wet Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (93.6%)
Dry Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
77%
Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Best: Vredestein Wintrac (88.0%)
Dry Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 860 (91.0%)
Snow Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
82%
Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
Snow Traction
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Snow Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Snow Circle Cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Best in category: Debica Frigo HP2 (93.3%)
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Ride Comfort
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Best in category: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ (92.0%)
Economy
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
68%
Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Best: Nokian WR Snowproof (94.0%)
Mileage
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Best: Michelin Alpin 6 (98.0%)
Best in category: Continental WinterContact TS 870 (89.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison