Segment
4. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A vs. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Highly recommended3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended4. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended3. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Satisfactory4. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | |||||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Very good | 7.9 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 7.9 | 6.8 | ||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Good | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.7 | 7.5 | 7.4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
