Segment
2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory3. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Good | 1.9 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
