Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 has a better rating of 86% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 W330 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Good | 1.9 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||