• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 has a better rating of 86% compared to 81% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 W330 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (5)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2025 225/40 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2023 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2021 225/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2020 225/40 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Winter
2020 245/45 R18 View

Performance comparison

Averaged from 5 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
80%
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Wet Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Wet Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Best in category: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 (85.6%)
Dry Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
77%
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dry Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dry Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 (89.3%)
Snow Performance
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
83%
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Snow Braking
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Best: Kleber Krisalp HP3 (96.0%)
Snow Traction
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Best: Dunlop Winter (96.0%)
Snow Handling
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Snow Circle Cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Best: Dunlop Winter (96.0%)
Best in category: Kleber Krisalp HP3 (94.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
71%
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Noise Exterior
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Ride Comfort
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Best: Dunlop Winter (87.0%)
Best in category: Dunlop Winter (87.0%)
Economy
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
70%
Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Best: Barum Polaris 6 (96.0%)
Mileage
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Best in category: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 (88.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison