Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/55 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2,5 | 2,1 | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
