Segment
2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Pirelli (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and Pirelli Scorpion Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Scorpion Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 255/55 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and the Scorpion Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A has C wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Pirelli Scorpion Winter has B rating.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A
| Pirelli Scorpion Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R23 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Exemplary
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Pirelli Scorpion Winter Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||