Segment
3. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A vs. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R23 | R16 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A Rating: - | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: - | 1 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
