Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (61%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
