In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and the WinterContact TS 850P SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (61%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV also have C wet ratings.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended
1. Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Rating: Still recommended | 7,4 | 8,0 | 8,5 | 7,3 | |||
Continental WinterContact TS 850P SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 9,7 | 8,4 | 9,4 | 9,1 | |||
Show test details |