Segment
2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Premium3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Exemplary3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Recommended3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
Handling on gravel
Sand traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 SUV K127A Rating: Good | |||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
