Segment
2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and Vredestein Ultrac Satin, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Satin first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Recommended2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
