Segment
2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Pirelli (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the GTÜ 2017 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 45% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A has A wet grip rating, whereas 60% of Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 has B rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Exemplary2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Recommended2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Rating: Recommended | 181 | 62 | 49 | 42 | 15 | 6 | |
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Recommended | 190 | 63 | 56 | 42 | 17 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
