Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the GTÜ 2017 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 45% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Rating: Recommended | 181 | 62 | 49 | 42 | 15 | 6 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 59 | 54 | 42 | 15 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
