Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A vs. Continental SportContact 5 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Hankook (81%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and Continental SportContact 5 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 235/55 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and the SportContact 5 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 45% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Continental SportContact 5 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental SportContact 5 SUV Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Continental SportContact 5 SUV Rating: - | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
