Segment
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (76%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 45% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (84%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV K117A Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
