Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 has a better rating of 57% compared to 16% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 was done in 2022, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made in Hungary and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
