Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Falken (70%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 was done in 2022, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2022 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 and the Azenis FK510 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made in Hungary and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
2. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 6,3 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 7,3 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 7,9 | |||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,5 | 7,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||