Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (76%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport has a better rating of 87% compared to 57% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 265/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 and the Potenza Sport were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Bridgestone Potenza Sport also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 is made in Hungary and Potenza Sport is made in Poland/Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,3 | 7,2 | 7,2 | 6,3 | |||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 Rating: Good | 7,3 | 7,3 | 7,2 | 7,9 | |||
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Very good | 8,2 | 9,0 | 8,0 | 6,3 | |||
Show test details |