Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
