Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. Nokian zLine
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary3. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended3. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 235 | 109 | 126 | 19 | 8 | ||
| Nokian zLine | 240 | 119 | 121 | 22 | 9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 97,7 | 287,2 | 191,5 | 77,9 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 94,3 | 266,5 | 189,2 | 81 | 98 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
