Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (81%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the GTÜ 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Turanza T001 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 278 | 146 | 143 | 25 | 10 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 225 | 102 | 123 | 17 | 10 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 235 | 109 | 126 | 19 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 97,7 | 287,2 | 191,5 | 77,9 | 100 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 94,3 | 266,5 | 189,2 | 81 | 98 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||