Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (80%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and Bridgestone Potenza S001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Potenza S001 were tested.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 8,9 | 8,8 | 7,9 | |||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 7,6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||