Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 Sufficient
