In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Line SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Nokian Line SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE
|
Summer
|
2017 | 215/60 R17 | View |
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Nokian Line SUV
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.