Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good3. Nokian Line SUV Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | ||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Recommended | 148 | 62 | 50 | 16 | 7 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
