Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2017 215/60 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Line SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Nokian Line SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 42 | 37 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 144 | 57 | 47 | 16 | 9 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Recommended | 141 | 61 | 44 | 14 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||