Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Comparing the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Continental PremiumContact 6, we can discern clear differences between both tyres. The K125 has an overall rating of 72%, and it excels in wet cornering and gravel traction. Conversely, the PremiumContact 6 has an overall rating of 87%, standing out for its high performance in wet braking and handling.

The Hankook K125, which was initially equipped on the Citroën C3 Aircross, was manufactured in Hungary. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 subsequently replaced this tyre. Notably, this Hankook tyre often secured mid to high positions in most tests.

Notably, in ADAC's tyre test of 15 tyres, the Hankook K125 ranked 7th and was praised for its wet circle cornering capabilities. The tyre also showed impressive performance in Autobild's test, positioned 2nd out of 52 tyres. Here, handling in both dry and wet conditions, as well as braking, stood out as strengths. Additionally, Hankook K125's gravel and sand traction have been favourably highlighted.

On the other hand, Continental, a leading tyre manufacturer, produces the PremiumContact 6 in Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic. The PremiumContact 7 replaced this tyre model recently.

This Continental tyre consistently secured top positions in various tests, ranking 1st in both ADAC and Autobild tests. Its performance in wet conditions, notably in braking and handling, is repeatedly praised across different evaluations. Moreover, it ranked relatively high in the Teknikens, Autozeitung, and ACE tests, positioning 4th, 2nd, and 3rd respectively.

Overall, the Continental PremiumContact 6 outperforms the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 in overall rating and test rankings. The PremiumContact 6 shows excellent performance in both dry and wet conditions, which is a key consideration when choosing tyres. Do note that these tyres have been replaced by newer models.