Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Matador (9%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 72% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 53% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R23 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
