Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Evo has a better rating of 98% compared to 72% of the Nokian Powerproof 2. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Evo was done in 2025, compared to 2026 when was the Nokian Powerproof 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Ventus Evo and the Powerproof 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Hankook Ventus Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Ventus Evo
| Nokian Powerproof 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||