Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Nokian Powerproof 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
