Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 34.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
