Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good4. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended3. Nokian Powerproof 2 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 34.3 | 27.3 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof 2 | 34.4 | 28.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
