Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Evo has a better rating of 98% compared to 87% of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Ventus Evo and the Ecsta Sport (PS72) were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Hankook Ventus Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Ventus Evo
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) | 34.4 | 27.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
