Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium3. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Premium4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium5. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo Highly recommended3. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Highly recommended4. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Test winner5. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus evo | 32.8 | 27 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | 34.5 | 27.5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport EVO | 34.5 | 28.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Ventus Evo Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Evo | 34.0 | 27.4 | |||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | 34.1 | 28.3 | |||||
| Pirelli P Zero PZ4 | 34.6 | 32.3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport | 32.6 | 27.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
