Segment
1. Hankook Vantra LT RA18 Premium2. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Vantra LT RA18 vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Vantra LT RA18 and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Vantra LT RA18 and the cLine VAN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 53% of Hankook Vantra LT RA18 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian cLine VAN has A rating.
| # | Hankook Vantra LT RA18
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Hankook Vantra LT RA18 Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
