Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Yokohama (58%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Yokohama Bluearth AE-50, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Bluearth AE-50 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 has A rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
