Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Vredestein Sportrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Sportrac 5 were tested.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
