Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Sava (62%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Sava Intensa HP, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Intensa HP were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Sava Intensa HP also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Sava Intensa HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
2. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
2. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 152 | 18 | 38 | 39 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 | 146 | 60 | 47 | 39 | |||
| Sava Intensa HP | 128 | 40 | 46 | 42 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||