Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium3. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium4. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle5. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle6. Sava Intensa HP Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Sava Intensa HP vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Vredestein Sportrac 5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
6. Sava Intensa HP 13.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Sava Intensa HP Satisfactory5. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100 | 109 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | |||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Very good | 98,7 | 98,7 | 98,7 | 109 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 96,8 | 97,2 | 96,4 | 86,5 | |||
| Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Rating: Weak | 95,6 | 93,6 | 97,5 | 97,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,1 | ||
| Sava Intensa HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,2 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,0 | 3,3 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
