Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (77%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 93% compared to 88% of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/65 R17 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.
# | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 1- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |