Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kumho Solus HA31
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating. We also know where Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made - Korea.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2019 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
