Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a better rating of 87% compared to 69% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating. We also know where Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made - Korea.
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
