Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we take a closer look at two allround tyres: the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Bridgestone Weather Control A005. Our team provides an in-depth analysis, using data from several tyre tests conducted by Autoklub ČR, Autobild, autobild 2020 and ACE.
The Hankook-manufactured tyre, Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a successor of Hankook Kinergy 4S. Made in Korea, it has multiple strengths as declared by various tests. It ranked 6th in Autoklub ČR and 4th in Autobild’s assessment. The tyre exhibited particular strengths in wet and snow handling, aquaplaning — longitudal as well as cross, and scored well in short dry and wet braking. However, it's worth mentioning that autobild 2020 highlighted the tyre's mediocre mileage and unsatisfactory ride comfort as its drawbacks.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 outperformed in several fields. Despite its 7th position in the ACE testing, it clenched the coveted 1st position in the Autobild's testing out of 27 tyres. Its strengths include dry handling, exterior noise, rolling resistance, dry and wet braking, and wet circle cornering. Sporty, dynamic handling in both wet and dry conditions, short wet and dry braking distances, and precise steering were few of the highlights mentioned in the autobild 2020 report. It did, however, show limitations in snowy conditions and satisfactory mileage.
Overall, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. While the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 stood out with its impressive wet and snow handling, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 impressed test experts with its high performance across different parameters, particularly in dry handling and braking. However, despite the Hankook tyre's prominent performance, the Bridgestone tyre was ultimately the one that managed to secure a better position in the majority of the tests.
Remember, your choice should always align with your driving conditions and personal preferences. Both these tyres have proved their strong competence in multiple tests, yet the Bridgestone Weather Control A005's overall performance appears to slightly edge out the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. It is always worth considering the tests’ feedback regarding their performance in specific areas, such as wet, dry or snowy conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
8
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 99,8 | 99,3 | 106,9 | 98,3 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 95,6 | 98,8 | 102,6 | 94,4 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 98,3 | 98,4 | 106,9 | 89,7 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 40,9 | 45 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 200 | 66 | 66 | 49 | 18 | 8 | |
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Recommended | 189 | 52 | 61 | 46 | 17 | 6 | |
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Recommended | 187 | 43 | 65 | 47 | 18 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42 | 50,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 39,7 | 46,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Not recommended | 2+ | 2 | 3- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 43,1 | 47,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
