Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium5. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium6. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle7. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Comparing the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 across independent tyre tests shows two closely matched all-season tyres with different strengths. Both models share an overall score of 89% in our rating, but test rankings and discipline-specific results reveal where each tyre excels.
Quick links: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 — manufacturer: Hankook. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 — manufacturer: Bridgestone.
Replacement status: neither model has a listed direct replacement in our database.
Summary of test results
- Autobild (16 tyres): Bridgestone finished higher (position 3) while Hankook placed 8. Autobild highlights Bridgestone's top marks in wet and dry braking and handling, and praises Hankook for low rolling resistance and aquaplaning cross performance.
- SportAuto (6 tyres): Hankook narrowly beat Bridgestone (2nd vs 3rd), confirming Hankook's convincing overall balance in mixed conditions.
- Autobild 2023 / 2025 summaries: test text notes Hankook as a proven all-rounder with reliable snow and ice performance and good mileage, but with slightly longer wet and dry braking distances. Bridgestone is praised as a new all-round talent with short wet/dry braking distances and strong aquaplaning resistance, albeit at a higher price point.
Strengths & weaknesses
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
- Strengths: excellent rolling resistance (fuel economy), very good performance on snow and ice, strong aquaplaning cross behaviour, high mileage.
- Weaknesses: slightly longer wet and dry braking distances than the best-performing rivals; placed mid-field in Autobild tests.
- Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- Strengths: top-tier wet and dry braking and handling, very good wet grip and aquaplaning resistance; generally placed higher in Autobild testing.
- Weaknesses: higher price level; slightly less focused on fuel-economy benefits compared with Hankook.
Which tyre is better overall?
On balance, test positions and discipline results give the edge to the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 for drivers prioritising dynamic handling and the shortest wet/dry braking distances — it ranked higher in Autobild and achieved top marks in braking and handling tests. However, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 remains the smarter choice for those who prioritise fuel economy, long mileage and winter traction, and it performed slightly better in SportAuto’s comparison.
Verdict: both tyres are competitive 4-season options with the same overall score (89%). Choose Bridgestone for superior wet/dry grip and sportier handling; choose Hankook for better rolling resistance, snow performance and value-oriented longevity.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary3. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary4. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary5. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner6. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner7. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended4. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory5. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory6. Nexen N Blue 4 Season Conditionally recommended7. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 2 | ||||
| BRIDGESTONE Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| GOODYEAR Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Very good | 9.5 | 8.2 | 10.0 | 8.9 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Very good | 8.7 | 8.9 | 8.9 | 7.7 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 7.8 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 8.0 | |||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Good | 7.8 | 8.3 | 8.5 | 9.4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | 38.5 | 45 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.7 | 47 | |||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41.8 | 48.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
