Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S2 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Nokian (63%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S2 and Nokian WR SUV 4, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
| # | Hankook H750 Kinergy 4S2
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
