Segment
1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Dynapro HP2 RA33 and the Line SUV were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has B wet grip rating, whereas 63% of Nokian Line SUV has A rating.
| # | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Premium2. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
2. Nokian Line SUV Good
2. Nokian Line SUV Good
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | ||
| Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Rating: Good | 3,3 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 3+ | |||||
| Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 | 3+ | 3 | |||||
| Nokian Line SUV | 2 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||