18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 /0%	General Tire Grabber GT Plus /43%	Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R15 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Premium

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Premium

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 70

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 0

Number of tests

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 5x

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2x

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 2x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 1.

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 5.

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 3.

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9.

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 11.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 8

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 9

Year of the last test

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 2023

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 2018

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 2017

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Good

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Good

2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

87%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

67%

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 91%

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 72%

3. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 68%

Wet braking

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 89%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 80%

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 64%

Wet circle cornering

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 79%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 62%

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 42%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 75%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 64%

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 56%

Wet handling

1. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 99%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 61%

3. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 48%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus A

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 B

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33

80%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 78%

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus 72%

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 52%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 ?

2. General Tire Grabber GT Plus ?

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33

81%

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

63.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

General
Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33

78%

Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. General Tire Grabber GT Plus C

2. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 C

3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands