Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 51% of the GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Radial WinterPro2 Sport and the Blizzak 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3.0 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Good | 2.3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport | 39.2 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 35.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Rating: Good | 8.0 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 8.0 | 7.0 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Very good | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||