Segment
1. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Lowcost2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport has a better rating of 51% compared to 49% of the Apollo Aspire XP Winter. The first tyre test of GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Apollo Aspire XP Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Radial WinterPro2 Sport and the Aspire XP Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Lowcost2. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3.0 | ||||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Poor | 2.7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport | 39.2 | ||||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 37.3 | 28.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||